Two capacitors $C_1$ and $C_2$ are charged to 120V and 200V respectively. It is found that by connecting them together the potential on each one can be made zero. Then,
A) $3\mathop C\nolimits_1 = 5\mathop C\nolimits_2 $
B) $3\mathop C\nolimits_1 + 5\mathop C\nolimits_2 $
C) $9\mathop C\nolimits_1 = 4\mathop C\nolimits_2 $
D) $5\mathop C\nolimits_1 = 3\mathop C\nolimits_2 $
Answer
660.9k+ views
Hint: In this question, use the relationship between the capacitance, charge and potential of a capacitor that is $Q = CV$. Use the constraints given in the question to find the charge onto the two capacitors. Then use the fact that since the potential is found to be zero therefore the capacitors must be connected in phase opposition that is \[\mathop Q\nolimits_1 - \mathop Q\nolimits_2 = 0\]. This will help to get the right answer to this problem.
Complete answer:
As we know the charge stored by the capacitor is the product of individual capacitance and the voltage stored in the capacitor.
$ \Rightarrow Q = CV$……. (1)
Where Q= charge, C= capacitance, V= voltage
Now, let the capacitance of the first capacitor be $\mathop C\nolimits_1 $and the capacitance of the second capacitor be $\mathop C\nolimits_2 $
The charged voltage of the first and second capacitor are 120V and 200V.
So, the charges on the first and capacitors are
$\mathop Q\nolimits_1 = 120\mathop C\nolimits_1 $coulomb
AND
$\mathop Q\nolimits_2 = 200\mathop C\nolimits_2 $coulomb
Now it is given that they are connected in parallel and it is found that the potential on each of them is zero so from equation (1) if the potential or voltage on each of them is zero then the charge on each of them is zero.
It is only possible when they are connected in phase opposition such that \[\mathop Q\nolimits_1 - \mathop Q\nolimits_2 = 0\]
Now, substitute the value in above equation we have,
\[\mathop Q\nolimits_1 - \mathop Q\nolimits_2 = 0\]
$ \Rightarrow 120\mathop C\nolimits_1 - 200\mathop C\nolimits_2 = 0$
Now, simplify this we have
$ \Rightarrow 120\mathop C\nolimits_1 = 200\mathop C\nolimits_2 $
Divide by 40 throughout we have,
$3\mathop C\nolimits_1 = 5\mathop C\nolimits_2 $
$\therefore$ The required relation between $\mathop C\nolimits_1 $ and $\mathop C\nolimits_2 $ i.e first and second capacitor. Hence, option (A) is the correct answer.
Note:
The parallel combinatory of the capacitors is exactly equivalent to that series connection of the resistors$\mathop C\nolimits_{eq} = \mathop C\nolimits_1 + \mathop C\nolimits_2 $. It is advised to remember the direct relationship that is q=cv. A parallel plate capacitor is formed by charging parallel plates which may have dielectric or air-filled in between the plates. these plates are separated by some distance d and if A is the area of cross-section of the plates then capacitance $C$ is given by $C=\dfrac{{\epsilon}_o A}{d}$
Complete answer:
As we know the charge stored by the capacitor is the product of individual capacitance and the voltage stored in the capacitor.
$ \Rightarrow Q = CV$……. (1)
Where Q= charge, C= capacitance, V= voltage
Now, let the capacitance of the first capacitor be $\mathop C\nolimits_1 $and the capacitance of the second capacitor be $\mathop C\nolimits_2 $
The charged voltage of the first and second capacitor are 120V and 200V.
So, the charges on the first and capacitors are
$\mathop Q\nolimits_1 = 120\mathop C\nolimits_1 $coulomb
AND
$\mathop Q\nolimits_2 = 200\mathop C\nolimits_2 $coulomb
Now it is given that they are connected in parallel and it is found that the potential on each of them is zero so from equation (1) if the potential or voltage on each of them is zero then the charge on each of them is zero.
It is only possible when they are connected in phase opposition such that \[\mathop Q\nolimits_1 - \mathop Q\nolimits_2 = 0\]
Now, substitute the value in above equation we have,
\[\mathop Q\nolimits_1 - \mathop Q\nolimits_2 = 0\]
$ \Rightarrow 120\mathop C\nolimits_1 - 200\mathop C\nolimits_2 = 0$
Now, simplify this we have
$ \Rightarrow 120\mathop C\nolimits_1 = 200\mathop C\nolimits_2 $
Divide by 40 throughout we have,
$3\mathop C\nolimits_1 = 5\mathop C\nolimits_2 $
$\therefore$ The required relation between $\mathop C\nolimits_1 $ and $\mathop C\nolimits_2 $ i.e first and second capacitor. Hence, option (A) is the correct answer.
Note:
The parallel combinatory of the capacitors is exactly equivalent to that series connection of the resistors$\mathop C\nolimits_{eq} = \mathop C\nolimits_1 + \mathop C\nolimits_2 $. It is advised to remember the direct relationship that is q=cv. A parallel plate capacitor is formed by charging parallel plates which may have dielectric or air-filled in between the plates. these plates are separated by some distance d and if A is the area of cross-section of the plates then capacitance $C$ is given by $C=\dfrac{{\epsilon}_o A}{d}$
Recently Updated Pages
Which of the following graphs shows the variation of class 12 physics CBSE

Draw a labelled diagram of the human male reproductive class 12 biology CBSE

Describe the experiment to compare the emf of two cells class 12 physics CBSE

What is standard hydrogen electrode

What is conventional current and electric current class 12 physics CBSE

2Bromopentane is treated with an alcoholic KOH solution class 12 chemistry CBSE

Trending doubts
Draw a labelled sketch of the human eye class 12 physics CBSE

Which are the Top 10 Largest Countries of the World?

Differentiate between homogeneous and heterogeneous class 12 chemistry CBSE

Draw ray diagrams each showing i myopic eye and ii class 12 physics CBSE

Which is the correct genotypic ratio of mendel dihybrid class 12 biology CBSE

What is the Full Form of PVC, PET, HDPE, LDPE, PP and PS ?

